Perfectionism (“I need the exact value of pi!”) can impede finding good, usable results. Sometimes the best is the enemy of the good. Life LessonsĮven math can have life lessons hidden inside. Our equations don’t need to be razor-sharp if the universe and our instruments are fuzzy. The idea that “close counts” is weird - shouldn’t math be precise? Math is a model to describe the world. A shape with 96 sides was accurate enough for anything Archimedes needed to build. I’ll say it again: Good enough is good enough. Just start cranking away and stop when pi is good enough.". When we see π it really means "You want perfection? That's nice - everyone wants something. This is formally known as the Squeeze Theorem. As we tightened up the outside limits (pun intended), we knew pi was hiding somewhere inside. We didn’t know exactly where pi was, but trapped it between two boundaries. For example, computers can start with a rough guess for the square root and make it better (faster than finding the closest answer from the outset). There are numerical methods to refine a formula again and again. Archimedes discovered that adding sides made a better estimate. Calculus has many concepts such as Taylor Series to build a guess with varying degrees of accuracy. We had a guess for pi: somewhere between 2.8 and 4. We don’t know the answer, but we’ve got a guess.Where’s the Calculus?Īrchimedes wasn’t “doing calculus” but he laid the groundwork for its development: start with a crude model (square mimicking a circle) and refine it. There’s even better formulas out there too. Some people use 22/7 for pi, but now you can chuckle “Good grief, 22/7 is merely the upper bound found by Archimedes 2000 years ago!” while adjusting your monocle. If you enjoy fractions, the mysteriously symmetrical 355/113 is an extremely accurate (99.99999%) estimate of pi and was the best humanity had for nearly a millennium. The midpoint puts pi at 3.14185, which is over 99.9% accurate. His final estimate for pi, using a shape with 96 sides, was: He began with hexagons (6 sides) and continued 12, 24, 48, 96 until he’d had enough (ever try to take a square root using fractions alone?). So Archimedes had to slave away with these formulas using fractions. Unfortunately, decimals hadn’t been invented in 250 BC, let alone spreadsheets. And after 17 steps, or half a million sides, our guess for pi reaches Excel’s accuracy limit. After 7 steps (512 sides) we have the lauded “five nines”. Let’s assume pi is halfway between the inside and outside boundaries.Īfter 3 steps (32 sides) we already have 99.9% accuracy. Starting with 4 sides (a square), we make our way to a better pi ( download the spreadsheet):Įvery round, we double the sides (4, 8, 16, 32, 64) and shrink the range where pi could be hiding. Using the Pythagorean theorem, side 2 + side 2 = 1, therefore side = $\sqrt$ and 1, we can repeatedly apply this formula to increase the number of sides and get a better guess for pi.īy the way, those special means show up in strange places, don’t they? I don’t have a nice intuitive grasp of the trig identities involved, so we’ll save that battle for another day. Inside square (not so easy): The diagonal is 1 (top-to-bottom).Outside square (easy): side = 1, therefore perimeter = 4.Whatever the circumference is, it’s somewhere between the perimeters of the squares: more than the inside, less than the outside.Īnd since squares are, well, square, we find their perimeters easily: Neat - it’s like a racetrack with inner and outer edges. We don’t know a circle’s circumference, but for kicks let’s draw it between two squares: (He actually used hexagons, but squares are easier to work with and draw, so let’s go with that, ok?). But he didn’t fret, and started with what he did know: the perimeter of a square. What’s behind door #3? Math! How did Archimedes do it?Īrchimedes didn’t know the circumference of a circle. Draw a circle with a steady hand, wrap it with string, and measure with your finest ruler.Pi is the circumference of a circle with diameter 1. I wish I learned his discovery of pi in school - it helps us understand what makes calculus tick. Could you find pi?Īrchimedes found pi to 99.9% accuracy 2000 years ago - without decimal points or even the number zero! Even better, he devised techniques that became the foundations of calculus. But what if you had no textbooks, no computers, and no calculus (egads!) - just your brain and a piece of paper. Sure, you “know” it’s about 3.14159 because you read it in some book.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |